Home > CPI, Economy, Federal Reserve > The Fed Needs More Inflation Nerds

The Fed Needs More Inflation Nerds

Earlier today I was on Bloomberg<GO> when the PCE inflation figures were released. As usual, it was an enjoyable time even if Alix Steel did call me a ‘big inflation nerd’ or something to that effect.

The topic was, of course, PCE – as well as inflation in general, how the Fed might respond (or not), and what the effect of the new Administration’s policies may be. You can see the main part of the discussion here, although not the part where Alix calls me a nerd. A man has some pride.

My main point regarding the PCE report was that PCE isn’t terribly low, but rather right on the long-run average as the chart below (all charts source Bloomberg) shows. Of course, PCE has been lagging behind the rise in CPI, but because it had been “too tight” previously this isn’t yet abnormal.


However, in the interview I didn’t get to the really nerdy part. Perhaps my ego was still stinging and so I didn’t want to highlight the nerdiness?[1] No matter. The nerdy part is that the reason PCE is low is actually no longer because of Medical Care, but because of housing. This next chart plots the spread of core CPI over core PCE, through last month’s figures, versus Owners’ Equivalent Rent (OER).


Housing has a much higher weight in the CPI than in the PCE, and as you can see the plodding nature of OER means that the correlation is somewhat persistent because housing inflation is somewhat persistent. Right now, OER (which, frankly, I thought would have leveled off by now) is rising and showing no signs of slowing, and this fact has served to widen the CPI-PCE spread back to its historical average and likely will cause it to widen to an above-average level. I suppose the good news there is that it is still true that outside of housing, core inflation is still not rising aggressively. Core services ex-housing are looking perkier, but core goods continue to languish as the dollar remains strong. The strength of the dollar almost beggars belief if it’s true that the rest of the world hates us now, but it is what it is.

The bigger point, for markets, is “so what?” There is nothing about a 1.7% core PCE that presents any urgency for Chairman Yellen. As I said on the program: as Yellen approaches the end of her chairmanship (in January 2018, since she insists Trump won’t chase her out before), I believe it is much more likely that she wants to be remembered for pushing the unemployment rate very low – because she believes inflation is easily controlled – than that she wants to be remembered for being a hawk that stopped inflation from getting going. She isn’t worried about inflation, and so the question is whether she wants to be criticized for adding “too many” jobs, or not adding enough. Not that monetary policy has much to do with that, but I believe she clearly will err on the side of keeping policy too loose. The Fed isn’t tightening this week, and I find it unlikely that they will tighten in March, unless inflation expectations rise considerably further than they have already (see chart of 5y5y inflation forward from CPI swaps, below). Even after the big rally since late last year, 5y5y is well below the long-term average through 2014.


And even if inflation expectations do rise further, the excuse from the chair will be easy: expectations are rising because the end (and possible reversal) of the globalization dividend and the imposition of tariffs will lead to higher prices. But there is nothing that Fed policy can do about this – it is a supply-side effect, just as high oil prices due to OPEC production restraints would represent a supply-side effect that the Fed shouldn’t respond to. So the excuses are all there for Dr. Yellen. History will show that she missed a chance to shrink the Fed’s balance sheet and avert the worst of the next inflationary upturn, but that history will not be written for some time.

[1] Ridiculous, of course. I embrace my nerdiness, at least when it comes to inflation.

Categories: CPI, Economy, Federal Reserve Tags:
  1. Mike Myers
    January 30, 2017 at 7:13 pm

    Michael, thanks for posting these missives for the rest of us to see.

    As an observer of the inflation ravages of the late 60’s and throughout the 70’s, it strikes me that a resurgence in inflation is at hand, but will be ignored by the markets until it cannot be. As an accountant, understanding the distortions of cost basis accounting, I like to keep a portion of my equity holdings in businesses that are heavy in capital investment and loaded up with debt. Due to historical cost accounting these will show show a falsely improving gross profit margin, and EPS, on their books as inflation takes hold. The accounting authorities, due to political reasons, will be reluctant to respond, and only implement replacement cost accounting once the fires of inflation are raging, just like in the past.

    • January 31, 2017 at 11:17 am

      Thanks Mike. I have a slide I sometimes use in inflation presentations to corporates, saying “You are exposed to inflation if….” and the counterargument as well. One of the points on the slide is the one you make here. I think it’s fair to say that almost NO ONE thinks of these issues these days.

  2. Mike Myers
    January 30, 2017 at 7:22 pm

    Well I left a comment but it never made it through.

    • January 31, 2017 at 11:15 am

      sorry…i usually get an email when there are new comments and for some reason didn’t. I’ve approved it now. Sorry!

  1. January 31, 2017 at 7:56 am

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: