Home > CPI, Tweet Summary > Summary of My Post-CPI Tweets (Oct 2023)

Summary of My Post-CPI Tweets (Oct 2023)

Below is a summary of my post-CPI tweets. You can follow me on X at @inflation_guy. Sign up for email updates to my occasional articles here. Individual and institutional investors, issuers and risk managers with interests in this area be sure to stop by Enduring Investments! Check out the Inflation Guy podcast!

  • Welcome to the #CPI #inflation walkup for November (October’s figure). This is the next-to-last month I will be doing this!
  • If you miss the live tweets, you can find a summary later at https://inflationguy.blog and I will podcast a summary at inflationguy.podbean.com . Those will continue in 2024 after the live tweeting stops.
  • Well, this report ought to be interesting. My forecasts are very different from the other forecasts out there. The Bloomberg consensus has +0.09% on SA headline, and 0.30% on core. The swap market, Kalshi, and Cleveland Fed are all in the same ballpark.
  • I have 0.14% NSA, roughly 0.22% on headline, and 0.38% on core.
  • It is a little wild to me that everyone else is so low, and it makes me concerned that I’m missing something. But I think it comes down to the fact that everyone must be expecting a big give-back on OER this month.
  • Used car prices should add this month. Health care insurance pivots from an 0.04% drag to an 0.02% add. Even airfares could rise, despite sliding jet fuel, because fares are too low given the level of fuel.
  • All of those are in my forecast (well, I conceded flat on airfares but it could go either way). I assume they’re in everyone’s forecast. So that leads me to believe that the assumption is a correction in OER is in store.
  • OK, I see the chart too. It sure LOOKS like OER did something weird last month. If OER prints 0.45% m/m instead of 0.55%, then that takes 2.5bps off my forecast. That still doesn’t get there. You need an 0.35% or something.
  • And oh by the way, I’d argue that the jump might just be payback for a too-rapid fall that happened earlier this year. There was no reason to expect monthlies to drop from 0.7% m/m in Feb to 0.48% in March. Rents are not collapsing and home prices are now going back up.
  • I know that’s inconvenient to the deflation story but it’s right on par with where my model says it should be. (Our model is Primary Rents but OER is based on rents).
  • So okay, I’ll drop my forecast 2.5bps on the assumption we go back to 0.45% m/m for OER. Now ya happy?!? But I’m not assuming any ‘payback’.
  • Meanwhile, I haven’t even talked about the fact that I have +1% on Used Cars, but that might be too conservative given how strong auctions were in the latter part of September (not picked up in the last number).
  • And I don’t have anything for New Cars – but thanks to the new wage agreement, car prices both New and Used are going to go up again.
  • I’ve already spoken plenty about the reversal in Health Insurance; it shouldn’t take anyone by surprise this year.
  • The change in method means that the shift from -0.04% to +0.02% per month should only last six months – it shortens the lag but this transition period increases the effect to synchronize.
  • With all this, Core CPI should stay at 4.1% y/y, or rise (if my forecast is on point). As I said last month, getting it below 4% is going to be more of a challenge. And Median inflation will fall to probably around 5.25% this month, but again we’re in the hard part now.
  • Breakevens have net slumped a bit this month, but that hides the fact that after last month’s CPI they spiked for a week or so. 10y breaks got to 2.50%  in the bond market selloff before settling back.
  • If the bond bear market continues (and the balance of large government budget deficits, smaller trade deficits, and a Fed in run-off means more pressure on rates to attract domestic savers), breakevens will go back up.
  • Not sure that’s a good play in Q4, since this tends to be a good seasonal time for bonds, but a bad CPI could change that. And, naturally, with a recession coming (we think?) it’ll be harder to get higher rates immediately.
  • However…the secular bull market in bonds is over so the real question is whether interest rates are aimless for a decade, or in a secular bear market. Too long a topic for a tweet storm!
  • So that’s it for the walkup. Pretty simple task today: 1. check OER, 2. check core ex-housing, 3. check core services ex-housing (“supercore” for a finer read on the Fed (?))
  • Keep checking the improving distribution of inflation – core below median means the tails are moving to the downside, in a disinflationary signature, but not sure that will outlast 2024.
  • Good luck!

  • Very soft number! Let’s see how much of this is ‘payback.’
  • If it’s CPI day there must be I.T. issues. It’s a law. Headline was +0.045%, Core +0.227%. Used cars was a DRAG, which is completely at odds with surveys. OER dropped to 0.41% m/m, but that by itself wouldn’t be enough for the downside surprise.
  • Airfares fell, Lodging away from home fell significantly, New Cars was a marginal decline…and health insurance didn’t add as much as it was supposed to (not sure why) although it was positive. Looks like a well-rounded soft number.
  • Here is m/m OER. Back to prior level, but no payback.
  • In the big picture, the 3-month average isn’t all that soothing, especially when we look at Used Cars and other quirks that will likely be repaid.
  • So Black Book was -1.85% in September, NSA CPI Used Cars was -5.63%. BB was +1.07% in October, NSA CPI Used Cars was -1.40%. Private auctions were strong. This is confounding – might be a seasonal quirk that BLS reflects different seasonals, but the NSA pretty far off.
  • m/m CPI: 0.0449% m/m Core CPI: 0.227%
  • Last 12 core CPI figures
  • M/M, Y/Y, and prior Y/Y for 8 major subgroups
  • Primary Rents: 7.18% y/y           OER: 6.85% y/y
  • Further: Primary Rents 0.5% M/M, 7.18% Y/Y (7.41% last)     OER 0.41% M/M, 6.85% Y/Y (7.08% last)     Lodging Away From Home -2.5% M/M, 1.2% Y/Y (7.3% last)
  • Some ‘COVID’ Categories: Airfares -0.91% M/M (0.28% Last)     Lodging Away from Home -2.45% M/M (3.65% Last)     Used Cars/Trucks -0.8% M/M (-2.53% Last)     New Cars/Trucks -0.09% M/M (0.3% Last)
  • Here is my early and automated guess at Median CPI for this month: 0.359%
  • Now, this is really the important thing. Median is still 0.36%. That tells you this is left-tail stuff more than the rents stuff.
  • Piece 1: Food & Energy: 0.17% y/y
  • Food at Home was +0.26% SA; Food Away from Home +0.37%. Food added 0.04% to headline, which was right on my forecast. Look, talk to any restaurateur – wages are still a big problem. Food AFH isn’t going to deflate soon.
  • Energy was -0.22% m/m NSA; I’d estimated -0.17% so it was very slightly more drag.
  • Piece 2: Core Commodities: 0.0948% y/y
  • Piece 3: Core Services less Rent of Shelter: 3.71% y/y
  • Piece 4: Rent of Shelter: 6.76% y/y
  • Core Goods: 0.0948% y/y        Core Services: 5.5% y/y
  • Core goods actually ticked up slightly. Despite the decline in Used and New cars.
  • This is part of the core goods story – continued acceleration in Medicinal Drugs. Honestly this is something we’ve been expecting for a long time and just surprised how long it has taken. Many of the APIs for pharma come from China.
  • Core ex-housing actually ticked up very slightly from 1.97% y/y to 2.05% y/y. That sounds great but prior to COVID it hadn’t been above 2% since 2012 so that’s still too high.
  • Largest declines (annualized m/m) in core were Lodging Away From Home (which is quite surprising) at -26% and Car and Truck Rental (also surprising) at -17%. Both core services but only the latter is “supercore”.
  • Largest advances Motor Vehicle Insurance +26%, Tobacco +25%, Jewelry and Watches +16%.
  • I am probably not going to be exactly right on median because in my calculation the median category is Northeast Urban OER, which means we’re relying on my ad-hoc seasonal adjustment. Could be as low as 0.32% m/m, or a smidge higher. Either way, it’s not price stability.
  • I guess on Health Insurance I’ll have to leave the explanation to someone with a pointier pencil. My calculations had the effect being about 2bps/month; this month is was about 0.8bps. I would call that negligible except that previously it had been a 4bps drag.
  • Our housing model, updated with the latest data. Kinda right on par. But notice our model never gets anywhere close to deflation in housing. Those calling for such are going to be disappointed.
  • This is a strange dichotomy and I wonder if some physician can explain it. Maybe doctors are making their money by channeling expensive services through hospitals. But it’s weird to see hospital inflation so buoyant while doctors’ services are deflating.
  • Education and Communication was a little soft. Some of that was a curious (to me) -0.24% NSA m/m decline in College tuition and fees. Probably a quirk. Also Telephone hardware was -1.9% m/m.
  • Apparel was soft – partly this is expected because of the lagged strength of the dollar on core goods, but the -5.1% decline in Women’s outerwear seems unusual.
  • The EI Inflation Diffusion Index is back almost to flat. Note that doesn’t mean 0 inflation. To get back to persistently having Median CPI around 2-3%, you’d want to see the diffusion index quite a bit negative. I think that’s going to be difficult.
  • Last chart, and it tells the story. Left tail is growing, but rest of the distribution is moving left only reluctantly. The big fingers on the right are housing. It’s encouraging that there is more diversity here – a sign that the money impulse that affects everything is waning.
  • Here is today’s summary. Core was surprisingly tame but it was largely from some quirky one-offs. Median didn’t improve very much. Neither Core nor Median over the last 3 months is where the Fed wants it. This doesn’t change, therefore, the higher-for-longer meme.
  • It also doesn’t demand further tightening, but that’s not news. We already knew the Fed was done.
  • Looking ahead, there will be further slow progress on housing, although as I keep saying – not as much as some forecasters think. The problem is that outside of housing, core inflation doesn’t look like it wants to fall much further.
  • Naturally all of this depends on what the Fed does going forward. If the money supply keeps bumping along around zero growth, then eventually the velocity rebound will run its course and inflation will go back to 2-3%.
  • But higher rates mean that velocity is probably going to do more than just rebound, so higher for longer will need to be longer than people expect – or, possibly, than the Fed can maintain in the face of recession.
  • That’s the hard part. This so far has been the easy part. If market rates rise again in sloppy fashion after the new year, despite recession signs…what does the Fed do? Inflation won’t be at target yet, or even close. Stay tuned!
  • …and thanks for staying tuned. Have a good day.

The CPI was a happy surprise today, but not so much that I would throw a party. The low miss was partly caused by inexplicable declines in autos and lodging away from home, while the correction in rents basically just went back to the prior level rather than stepping down to a slower pace. Rents are still going to come down, and in some places in the country they are falling – but in some places they are still rising briskly.

That dispersion in experienced rental inflation is actually part of the good news, and it’s good news that we see throughout the CPI over the last several months. It’s the good news that the Enduring Investments Inflation Diffusion Index is capturing: all prices are not moving as one, as they mostly did during the upswing in inflation. A high correlation between unrelated categories tends to suggest a common impulse is causing the movement – and is yet another reason that the notion that inflation was coming from various idiosyncratic supply chain issues should never have been entertained. There was clearly a large impulse acting on all prices: the 20%+ spike in money growth. Now that the money supply is flat, though velocity is rebounding, price dispersion is reasserting.

(Spoiler alert: it isn’t yet happening on the inter-country experience – all countries saw their inflation move in synchrony when it went up, and all are seeing it move in synchrony coming down, so it’s early to say the battle is won.)

We’re still just starting the difficult part, from the standpoint of monetary policy but also from the standpoint of figuring out how quickly inflation can get tamped back down to target. And the dispersion makes that more difficult, because the signal gets lost in the noise – just as it used to, before the money gusher. Next month we’ll have to deal with likely rebounds in Lodging Away from Home as well as increases in autos, reversing this month’s surprises, but we’ll probably get slightly better rent numbers.

What I can say is that the market reaction to all of this is absurd. This just doesn’t move the needle on the Fed. There was no tightening and no easing in the pipeline before this number, and after this number that hasn’t changed an iota. But at this hour stocks are +2% and bonds are soaring. I know the conventional wisdom is that rates are going back to zero…it just seems kind of early to get on that train when median inflation is still 5.3%…

  1. November 14, 2023 at 1:25 pm

    you and your Debbie Downer views that stocks aren’t going to the moon are a prime example of the negativity about the economy that so bedevils the administration 🙂

  2. Kevin
    November 14, 2023 at 3:50 pm

    So when it comes to readjust the health insurance, BLS uses a new method to manipulate the data to make it look lower? Do you think it is intentional? Or maybe next month’s data will be more accurate?

    • November 22, 2023 at 12:40 pm

      No, there’s nothing manipulative here. In fact, if they had wanted the number to be lower they could have transitioned as if it was 12 months and then just jumped to the new method after 6. By transitioning to the new method over the next 6 months they actually INCREASE the effect over that period. It’s just lower than I expected it to be. Error on my part, not on the BLS part I think!

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

%d